EVALUATION CRITERIA:
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score based on the likelihood of the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s). The following scored criteria are assessed:
Significance
- Addresses important problem, critical barrier, or unmet need.
- Rigor of prior research supporting the project (discuss limitations if data does not meet rigor guidelines).
- Improvement to scientific knowledge, technical capability, or clinical practice if aims achieved.
- Commercial potential of the product/service.
- For Phase II/Fast-Track: Strength of commercialization plan, market opportunity, and customer need.
- Convincing evidence of 'equipoise' (medical/patient communities view the question as important and the study as acceptable).
- Essentiality of the proposed exploratory trial to inform subsequent clinical development steps.
Investigator(s)
- Appropriateness of PD(s)/PI(s), collaborators, and researchers to the project.
- Sufficiency of effort dedicated to project.
- Experience and training of PD(s)/PI(s) and their accomplishments.
- For collaborative/multi-PD/PI projects: Complementary expertise, appropriate leadership/governance/organizational structure.
- For later stages: Team's expertise in commercializing the technology/service/product.
- Ability to organize, manage, and implement the clinical trial and meet milestones/timelines.
- Expertise in study coordination, data management, and statistics.
- For multicenter trials: Appropriateness of organizational structure, identification of potential center investigators and coordinating center staff.
Innovation
- Innovative approach to addressing a problem, barrier, or unmet need.
- Potential to challenge/shift current paradigms.
- Significant advantages over existing/developing approaches, methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions.
- For Phase II/Fast-Track: Reasonable plan to create a temporal barrier against competitors (e.g., IP protection).
- Advantage offered by proposed technology/product over existing/developing solutions for the same indication.
- Design/research plan includes innovative elements enhancing sensitivity, information potential, or scientific/clinical advancement.
Approach
- Research aims appropriate for current development stage and necessary to advance product/service.
- Well-reasoned strategy, methodology, and analyses to accomplish specific aims.
- Plans to address weaknesses in rigor of prior supporting research.
- Strategies to ensure robust and unbiased approach.
- Consideration of potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success.
- For Phase I: Ability to establish feasibility and manage risky aspects; clear, measurable Phase II milestones.
- For Fast-Track: Clear, measurable Phase II milestones; significant advancement toward commercialization.
- For Phase II: Demonstrated progress in Phase I, feasibility, and solid foundation for Phase II.
- Outline of specific plans for clinical development beyond this exploratory trial.
- Appropriateness of go/no-go criteria for subsequent efficacy trials (for later-stage exploratory trials).
- Evidence of patient group involvement in study design and recruitment.
- Leveraging existing NIH tools and resources (e.g., research networks).
- For renewal applications: Appropriateness of trial administration, recruitment progress, and likelihood of achieving aims.
- Consideration of NINDS Common Data Elements.
- Adequacy of study design for primary/secondary outcomes.
- Justification for study design based on prior rigorous research.
- Adequacy of power and interpretability of results.
- Appropriateness of study populations, intervention arms, and trial duration.
- Plans for recruitment, retention, handling dropouts, and monitoring accrual.
- Consideration of randomization, masking, controls, and inclusion/exclusion criteria.
- Plans to standardize and assure quality of protocol adherence and data collection.
- Adequate procedures for data management and quality control.
- Plan to complete data analysis within award period.
Environment
- Contribution of scientific and business environment to success and commercialization.
- Adequacy of SBC support, equipment, and physical resources.
- Benefit from unique features of scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements.
- For Phase I: Appropriate business expertise/resources identified for project aims and commercialization.
- For Phase II/Fast-Track: Access to business experts/resources for project aims and commercialization.
- Ability to address regulatory issues (internal staff or consultants).
- Appropriateness of administrative, data coordinating, enrollment, and laboratory/testing centers.
- Adequacy of ability to conduct trial at proposed sites.
- Evidence of individual site/center ability for multi-sites (enrollment, protocol adherence, data handling, organizational structure).
Additional Review Criteria (not scored, but considered):
-
Study Timeline: Detail, feasibility, justification, incorporation of efficiencies, discussion of challenges/solutions.
-
Intellectual Property (IP): Strength of IP portfolio/position, reasonable strategy to protect IP, IP sharing/management in multi-PD/PI/institution cases.
-
Fundraising Plan: Ability to establish relationships with third-party investors and secure substantial independent third-party funds. Detail and corroborating documentation (e.g., term sheet). Demonstrated value-added contribution of third-party funds.
-
Commercialization (Phase II and Fast-Track Only): Market opportunity, understanding barriers, strategies to address barriers, post-SBIR development/commercialization milestones, funding plan, suitability of management team, strategy for product adoption/revenue generation.
-
Protections for Human Subjects: Justification for human subject involvement, adequacy of protection against risks, potential benefits, importance of knowledge, data and safety monitoring. For exempt research, justification for exemption, human subjects involvement, and material sources.
-
Inclusion of Women, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, and Individuals Across the Lifespan: Justification for inclusion/exclusion based on scientific goals and research strategy, plans for inclusion. Consideration of participant diversity in recruitment/retention.
-
Vertebrate Animals: Description of procedures, justification for animal use, interventions to minimize discomfort, justification for euthanasia method.
-
Biohazards: Assessment of potential hazards, adequacy of proposed protection.