Applications for the Gambling Harms Research and Innovation Partnerships will be assessed rigorously by an expert panel, based on the following key criteria. It's crucial to address each area comprehensively in your proposal:
-
Vision (Word limit: 1,000 words):
- Quality and Importance: Assessors will evaluate if your proposed work is of excellent quality and significance within or beyond its specific field(s) or area(s).
- Advancement of Knowledge: Your proposal should demonstrate the potential to significantly advance current understanding or generate new knowledge, thinking, or discoveries.
- Timeliness: The relevance and timeliness of your work, considering current trends, context, and needs in gambling harms research, are important.
- Impact: Clearly articulate the potential impact of your work on world-leading research, society, the economy, or the environment. If your project has indirect 'place-based' outcomes (local, regional, national), identify these impacts and who the beneficiaries might be.
-
Approach (Word limit: 1,500 words):
- Effectiveness and Feasibility: Your chosen approach must be effective and appropriate for achieving your stated objectives. You need to show that it is feasible and that you have comprehensively identified and planned how to manage any risks to delivery.
- Methodology: If applicable, present a clearly written and transparent methodology.
- Building on Existing Work: Describe how your project will build upon and progress any previous relevant work.
- Translation of Outputs: Explain how you will maximize the translation of your project's outputs into tangible outcomes and broader impacts.
- Research Environment: Detail how your (and your team's) research environment contributes to the success of the work. If applicable, explain how your design will generate local, regional, or national impacts.
-
Applicant and Team Capability to Deliver (Word limit: 1,650 words: 1,150 for Résumé for Research and Innovation (R4RI) modules + up to 500 for Additions):
- Experience and Expertise: Demonstrate that you and your team possess the relevant experience (appropriate to career stage) and the right balance of skills and expertise to successfully carry out the proposed work. This includes showcasing contributions to new ideas, tools, or methodologies.
- Leadership and Management: Provide evidence of appropriate leadership and management skills, including your approach to developing other team members.
- Research Environment Contribution: Highlight your (and your team's) contributions to developing a positive research environment and the wider community.
- R4RI Format: This section must use the R4RI format to present individual and team achievements, focusing on contributions to the generation of new ideas, development of others, contributions to the wider R&I community, and broader societal benefit.
-
Ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) (Word limit: 500 words):
- Identification and Management: You must demonstrate that you have thoroughly identified and evaluated all relevant ethical or RRI considerations related to your proposed work, particularly given the sensitive nature of gambling harms research. Crucially, explain how you will effectively manage these considerations, including potential issues related to public harm, health, conflicts of interest, and safeguarding requirements.
-
Resources and Cost Justification (Word limit: 1,500 words):
- Justification of Costs: Provide clear justifications for all requested resources, especially more costly items like project staff, significant travel for fieldwork, equipment over £25,000, and any consumables beyond typical requirements. Justify all facilities and infrastructure costs, and specifically any resources costed as 'Exceptions'.
- Optimal Use: Show how your requested resources are comprehensive, appropriate, and justified, and how they represent the optimal use of funds to achieve your intended outcomes and maximize potential impacts.
Cross-Cutting Themes impacting scoring:
-
Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI): UKRI is committed to EDI. Applications are expected to demonstrate inclusivity, encourage applications from diverse researchers, and support varied personal circumstances (e.g., career breaks, flexible working). The composition of your team and your approach to partnership building will be scrutinized for EDI principles.
-
Impact Expectations: A key expectation is the potential for real-world impact in understanding gambling behavior and reducing harms, contributing to a future national strategy on gambling harms. This involves social, economic, and environmental impact.
-
Innovation: While Phase 1 is for partnership and analysis, the overall program expects innovative, stakeholder-informed responses to gambling-related harms. Proposals are expected to pave the way for actionable solutions in Phase 2.