Award Criteria and Scoring System
Proposals are scored from 0 to 5 for each criterion, with half-points allowed. An overall threshold of
37 points (out of 55 maximum) must be met for a proposal to be considered for funding.
Excellence and potential of disruption (Weight: 2)
- Quality of the overall concept and soundness of the proposed approach, including ideas, technologies, and methodology.
- Compliance of the proposal with the topic's objectives, scope, types of activities, functional requirements, and expected impact.
- Degree to which the project's objective and outcome offer an advantage over existing defence products/technologies, or its potential for disruption in the defence domain.
Innovation and technological development (Weight: 1)
- Demonstration of innovation potential; presence of groundbreaking/novel concepts/approaches (e.g., new products, services, business models), promising technological improvements, or application of technologies/concepts new to the defence sector.
- Integration of existing knowledge and previous R&D (defence/civil) to avoid unnecessary duplication.
- Potential for innovations/technologies to spin-off to other defence applications and products.
Competitiveness (Weight: 1)
- Foreseen competitive advantage of the solution compared to existing/planned products/technologies, considering the balance between performance and cost-efficiency.
- Potential to accelerate company growth across the EU, based on market analysis (EU and global, including expected sales volumes).
- Strength of the Intellectual Property (IP) strategy (e.g., patents) to support competitiveness and growth.
EDTIB autonomy (Weight: 2)
- Contribution to the autonomy of the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base (EDTIB) by reducing non-dependency on third countries.
- Beneficial impact on European security of supply, including creating new supply chains.
- Contribution to defence capability priorities agreed by Member States (CFSP, Capability Development Plan) and relevant regional/international priorities that align with EU security/defence interests and are inclusive.
Creation of new cross-border cooperation (Weight: 2)
- Extent of new cross-border cooperation established between legal entities in Member States or EDF associated countries, particularly SMEs and mid-caps, considering market specificity.
- Planned future cross-border cooperation and opportunities created by the project.
- Extent of substantial participation by cross-border SMEs and mid-caps and their industrial/technological added value.
Lifecycle efficiency (Weight: 1)
- Improvement in efficiency across the product/technology lifecycle compared to existing solutions (e.g., lower production, operational, maintenance, repair, overhaul, or disposal costs; simplification of processes).
Member State cooperation (Weight: 1)
- Contribution to the integration of the European defence industry by demonstrating Member States' commitment to jointly use, own, or maintain the final product/technology in a coordinated way.
- Contribution to increasing cooperation potential between Member States.
Implementation (Weight: 1)
- Effectiveness and practicality of the work plan structure (Work Breakdown Structure, timing, inter-relation of work packages).
- Usefulness and comprehensiveness of milestones and deliverables; clarity and measurability of criteria for reaching milestones.
- Appropriateness of management structures and decision-making mechanisms relative to project complexity and scale.
- Quality of risk management, including identification, assessment, and proposed mitigation measures for critical risks.
- Appropriateness of task and resource allocation among consortium members, ensuring valid and complementary roles and high effectiveness/efficiency of work share.
Priority Order for Same Scores
If multiple proposals have the same total score, priority is determined by:
1. Score for 'Excellence and potential of disruption'.
2. If still tied, score for 'Innovation and technological development'.
3. If still tied, score for 'Competitiveness'.
4. If still tied, score for 'Creation of new cross-border cooperation'.
5. If necessary, further prioritisation by the number of Member States or EDF associated countries where applicants are established.