3. EVALUATION CRITERIA
The evaluation is a two-step process with a 'GO' or 'NO GO' assessment at each stage against three core criteria. A consensus 'GO' is required to pass the remote evaluation, and a 'GO' from the jury is needed at the interview stage.
Scoring Factors
The evaluation is not based on a numerical score but on a 'GO' / 'NO GO' decision for each of the following three award criteria:
1. Excellence
2. Impact
3. Level of risk, implementation, and need for Union support
Innovation & Impact
- Excellence: The innovation must demonstrate a high degree of novelty and be supported by a solid, convincing business model. The timing for the innovation must be right, and the team must be credible, with the required skills and motivation.
- Impact: The project must show potential to create new markets or significantly disrupt existing ones. The innovation should be scalable with the potential for a significant return on investment. It must also demonstrate the potential to create significant societal or economic benefits for the European Union.
Project Quality
- Level of risk, implementation, and need for Union support: The application must present a clear and convincing plan for developing and commercializing the innovation. The financial needs of the project must be well-defined and realistic. The risk level must be appropriate for EIC investment, meaning the project is considered too risky for private investors to finance alone at this stage.
Strategic Fit
- The project's alignment with the STEP objectives (developing or manufacturing critical technologies in digital, clean tech, or biotech) is fundamental. The evaluation assesses if the innovation is 'high risk and high potential' and requires EIC's support to de-risk it for other investors. The project's contribution to reducing the EU's strategic dependencies is a key consideration.