The assessment process for this opportunity is highly structured, weighing both the scientific merit and technical feasibility of the proposed work.
Overall Assessment Areas
Your application will be assessed across the following main areas, with their respective contributions to the overall score:
- Vision and Approach (significant weight)
- Applicant and Team Capability to Deliver (significant weight)
- Resources and Justification (significant weight)
- Project Management Plan (significant weight)
- Data Management Plan (significant weight)
- RAC Additional Scoring Considerations (combined with above, totals 80% of the overall score)
- Technical Assessment by the DiRAC RSE Team (constitutes 20% of the overall score)
Detailed Scoring Factors
Vision and Approach
Assessors will evaluate your proposed work based on:
*
Quality and Importance: Is the work of excellent quality and significance within or beyond its field?
*
Advancement of Knowledge: Does it have the potential to advance current understanding or generate new knowledge, thinking, or discovery?
*
Timeliness: Is the project timely given current trends, context, and needs?
*
Impact Expectations: How will it impact world-leading research, society, the economy, or the environment? Will it lead to
step changes in knowledge (for thematic proposals)?
*
Strategic Alignment: How does it fit within the UK's activity and international standing? Is it significant to the
STFC science challenges and of strategic value within the STFC programme?
*
Competitiveness: Is the proposed work nationally and internationally competitive?
*
Methodology: Is the design effective, appropriate, and feasible? Does it identify risks and how they will be managed? Is the methodology clear and transparent?
*
Previous Work: How does it build upon and progress previous work?
*
Translation: How will outputs be maximised into outcomes and impacts?
*
Environment: How will the research environment contribute to success?
*
Code Efficiency: Details on codes and methods (appropriateness, efficiency of core usage), justification for exclusive system use (if requested).
Applicant and Team Capability to Deliver
Assessors look for evidence of:
*
Relevant Experience: Appropriate to career stage.
*
Skills and Expertise: The right balance of skills within the team.
*
Leadership and Management: Appropriate leadership to deliver the work and develop others.
*
Research Environment Contribution: Contribution to a positive research environment and wider community.
*
Standing: Necessary national or international standing and leadership.
Resources and Justification
- Comprehensiveness and Appropriateness: Are the requested computing time and storage resources comprehensive, appropriate, and justified?
- Optimal Use: Do the resources represent optimal use to achieve intended outcomes and maximise potential impacts?
- Essential Need: Why is the requested computing time essential for project completion?
- Impact of Reduction: Details on the scientific impact if a reduced allocation is awarded.
Technical Assessment (20% of score)
Conducted by the DiRAC RSE Team, assessing:
*
Architecture/Machine Selection: Appropriateness of the proposed architecture or machine selection.
*
Resource Usage Efficiency: How efficiently resources will be used.
*
Code Vectorization: How well the code(s) vectorise.
RAC Additional Scoring Considerations
- Alignment: How well the proposal aligns with the facility time opportunity guidelines.
- Previous DiRAC Usage: For applicants with prior allocations, full and effective usage will be considered. Reasons for any underuse will be taken into account (not applicable for new users or seedcorn allocations).
Cross-cutting Themes
- Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI): Questions on EDI are included in the application but are not assessed or scored. They are intended to encourage reflection.
- Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I): Applicants must demonstrate how their project complies with UKRI's TR&I principles, identifying risks (e.g., dual-use applications, relevance to UK National Security and Investment (NSI) Act, export control licenses) and mitigation controls. This is part of a compliance check rather than a direct scoring criterion, but failure to address it adequately can lead to issues.