Applications are reviewed for scientific and technical merit to assess their potential for significant impact.
Overall Impact Score
- Reviewers provide an overall impact score reflecting the likelihood of the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s).
Scored Review Criteria
These three factors directly contribute to the scientific merit score and overall impact:
-
Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation): How important and innovative is the proposed research in advancing the field?
-
Rigor and Feasibility (Approach): How well-designed, rigorous, and feasible is the proposed research approach?
-
Expertise and Resources (Investigator(s) and Environment): Do the investigators have the necessary expertise, and is the research environment suitable for the project?
Additional Review Criteria (Not Scored, but Considered for Overall Impact)
- Protections for Human Subjects: Adequacy of plans to protect human participants.
- Vertebrate Animals: Justification for animal use, appropriateness of species, and measures to minimize discomfort (if applicable).
- Biohazards: Assessment of hazardous materials/procedures and proposed protections (if applicable).
- Resubmissions: Evaluation of the entire revised application.
- Renewals: Assessment of progress made in the previous funding period.
- Revisions: Evaluation of whether the proposed expansion of the project's scope is appropriate.
Additional Review Considerations (Not Scored)
- Study Timeline: For clinical trials, detailed, feasible, and justified timeline, including start-up, enrollment rates, and follow-up. Discussion of potential challenges and solutions.
- Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources: Plans for validating these resources.
- Budget and Period of Support: Justification and reasonableness of the proposed budget and project duration in relation to the research.
Review and Selection Process
- Applications undergo scientific peer review by Scientific Review Groups. Only applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (typically the top half) will proceed to discussion and receive an overall impact score.
- Funding decisions are based on: 1) Scientific and technical merit (from peer review), 2) Availability of funds, and 3) Relevance of the project to the program's priorities.