Overall Impact
- Reviewers will assess the likelihood of the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved.
Scored Review Criteria
These factors contribute to the overall impact score and receive separate factor scores:
-
Factor 1. Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation):
- Potential to substantially improve the reliability of specific, clinically relevant biomarker assays.
- Potential to improve understanding of how biopsy collection, processing, and storage procedures affect analytical performance for current and emerging clinical biomarkers.
- Clear definition of the study's context and biomarkers in current clinical trials.
- Significance of the proposed studies and the unmet clinical need addressed.
- Evidence suggesting proposed preanalytical factors are problematic for biomarker assays and that improvement strategies can be identified.
- How results will advance and contribute to expediting clinical biomarker assay development through evidence-based standardization.
-
Factor 2. Rigor and Feasibility (Approach):
- Clear objectives and unambiguous scientific goals/hypotheses.
- Assessment of analytical performance characteristics (specificity, sensitivity, precision) in the context of specific preanalytical conditions.
- How results contribute new knowledge in biospecimen science and advance clinical biomarker assay development.
- Statistical justification for the study design (specimen numbers, biomarker evaluations, statistical power, precision, probability of effect detection).
- Focus on biospecimen preanalytical variability in small tumor tissue and liquid biopsies.
- How the proposed biomarker assay(s) will advance/improve a significant cancer clinical problem and help patient diagnosis, prognosis, or treatment.
-
Factor 3. Expertise and Resources (Investigator(s) and Environment):
- Ability of the applicant's team to perform preanalytical, analytical, and clinical validation of assays.
- Multidisciplinary scientific teams (e.g., pathologists, oncologists, radiologists, molecular biologists, statisticians) with expertise in clinical medicine, biospecimen procurement, biology, technology platforms, experimental design, and analysis.
Additional Review Criteria (Considered, but not scored)
- Protections for Human Subjects: Appropriateness of proposed protections.
- Vertebrate Animals: Appropriateness of proposed use.
- Biohazards: Management plans.
- Resubmissions, Renewals, Revisions: Appropriateness of the proposed expansion of the scope of the project, as applicable.
Additional Review Considerations (Considered, but not scored)
- Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources: Validity of plans for identifying and ensuring resource validity.
- Budget and Period of Support: Justification and reasonableness in relation to the proposed research.