Evaluation Criteria
Proposals are evaluated based on three standard criteria for Research and Innovation Actions (RIA), each scored out of 5, with an overall threshold of 10/15 required for funding consideration.
1. Excellence (Threshold: 3/5)
- Clarity and Pertinence of Objectives: How clear, pertinent, and ambitious the project's objectives are. The proposal must demonstrate that it goes beyond the current state-of-the-art.
- Methodology: The soundness of the proposed methodology. This includes the underlying concepts, models, and assumptions. Key aspects assessed are:
- Inter-disciplinary Approaches: How the project integrates different fields of expertise.
- Gender Dimension: How the gender dimension (sex and/or gender analysis) is appropriately considered in the research and innovation content.
- Open Science Practices: The quality of practices for managing and sharing research outputs, and for engaging with citizens, civil society, and end-users.
2. Impact (Threshold: 3/5)
- Credibility of Pathways to Impact: The credibility of the proposed pathways to achieve the expected outcomes and impacts specified in the work programme. The likely scale and significance of the project's contributions are key.
- Maximizing Impact: The suitability and quality of the measures outlined in the dissemination and exploitation plan, including communication activities, to maximise the project's expected outcomes and impacts.
- Strategic Fit: Projects should align with the EU Preparedness Union Strategy, DG ECHO recommendations, and the EU's disaster resilience goal No. 2. Proposals are encouraged to use the 'Special Eurobarometer on Disaster risk awareness and preparedness'.
3. Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation (Threshold: 3/5)
- Work Plan and Resources: The quality and effectiveness of the work plan, including a thorough assessment of risks. The appropriateness of the effort and resources assigned to each work package is evaluated.
- Consortium Capacity: The capacity and role of each participant, and the extent to which the consortium as a whole brings together the necessary expertise to execute the project successfully.
Special Evaluation Aspect
- Portfolio Approach: To ensure a balanced portfolio, the evaluation will fund applications not only by rank but will also ensure at least one highest-ranked project is funded from each of the two main scope options (Option a: Tools and solutions; Option b: Dialogue mechanisms), provided they meet all scoring thresholds.