Evaluation Criteria
Proposals are evaluated against three main criteria: Excellence, Impact, and Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation. Each criterion is scored from 0 to 5. A proposal must achieve a minimum score of 3 for each individual criterion and an overall score of at least 10 to be considered for funding.
Scoring Factors
- Excellence (Threshold: 3/5):
- Clarity and pertinence of the project’s objectives: How well the project's goals align with the topic's scope.
- Ambition and Innovation: The extent to which the proposed work is ambitious, goes beyond the current state-of-the-art in autonomous disaster response systems, and is positioned at an appropriate R&I maturity level (TRL).
- Methodology: The soundness of the proposed methodology, including the underlying concepts, inter-disciplinary approaches, and the quality of open science practices (e.g., data management, open access).
- Impact (Threshold: 3/5, Weighting: 1.5x):
- Pathway to Impact: The credibility of the plan to achieve the expected outcomes and impacts specified in the work programme, such as enhancing responder safety, improving situational awareness, and building capacity. The likely scale and significance of the project's contributions are assessed.
- Measures to Maximise Impact: The suitability and quality of the plan for dissemination, exploitation, and communication of project results to relevant stakeholders, including first responders, civil protection agencies, and policymakers.
- Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation (Threshold: 3/5):
- Work Plan: The quality and effectiveness of the work plan, including a robust risk assessment and the appropriateness of the effort and resources assigned to each work package.
- Consortium Capacity: The capacity and role of each participant, and the extent to which the consortium as a whole brings together the necessary expertise, infrastructure, and resources to successfully complete the project.
Strategic Fit
Proposals must demonstrate a strong alignment with the strategic objectives of the 'Disaster-Resilient Society for Europe' destination. This includes contributing to the EU's preparedness for complex crises, particularly those exacerbated by conflict, and delivering innovative technological solutions that can be validated in realistic, demanding environments.
Cross-cutting Themes
- Gender Dimension: Proposals must describe how the gender dimension (i.e., sex and/or gender analysis) is taken into account in the project’s research and innovation content.
- Open Science: The quality of open science practices is a key part of the 'Methodology' assessment under the Excellence criterion. This includes responsible management of research data and open access to publications.