Award Criteria
Proposals are evaluated against three main criteria, each scored out of 5. An individual threshold of 3 applies per criterion, and an overall threshold of 10 applies to the sum of the three scores.
-
Excellence (40% weighting)
- Clarity and pertinence of the project's objectives, and the extent to which the proposed work is ambitious and goes beyond the state of the art.
- Soundness of the proposed methodology, including underlying concepts, models, assumptions, and inter-disciplinary approaches.
- Appropriate consideration of the gender dimension in research and innovation content.
- Quality of open science practices, including sharing and management of research outputs and engagement of citizens/civil society.
-
Impact (40% weighting, weighted by 1.5 for ranking purposes)
- Credibility of the pathways to achieve the expected outcomes and impacts specified in the work programme.
- Likely scale and significance of the project's contributions.
- Suitability and quality of measures to maximize expected outcomes and impacts, as outlined in the dissemination and exploitation plan (including communication activities).
-
Implementation (20% weighting)
- Quality and effectiveness of the work plan.
- Assessment of risks.
- Appropriateness of the effort assigned to work packages and overall resources.
- Capacity and role of each participant, and the extent to which the consortium as a whole brings together the necessary expertise.
Ranking and Prioritization
- Proposals passing both individual and overall thresholds will be considered for funding.
- In case of tied scores, priority is given based on:
- Addressing aspects of the call not covered by higher-ranked proposals.
- Higher score in 'Excellence' (if still tied, then 'Impact'). For Innovation Actions, priority is given to 'Impact' first, then 'Excellence'.
- Gender balance among researchers.
- Geographical diversity (number of Member States/Associated Countries represented).