Applications are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through NIH's peer review system, considering the likelihood of the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field.
Scored Review Criteria
Reviewers will provide an overall impact score and separate factor scores for the first two factors:
-
Factor 1. Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation):
- How the proposed research may advance understanding of biological mechanisms contributing to cancer health disparities in underrepresented and/or underserved populations.
-
Factor 2. Rigor and Feasibility (Approach):
- How the approach is appropriate to evaluate how biology may influence risk, incidence, and/or progression of cancer in underrepresented and underserved populations.
- This includes the development and testing of new methodologies, models, and secondary data analyses.
-
Factor 3. Expertise and Resources (Investigator(s) and Environment):
- How the investigative team is well-suited to study biological mechanisms of cancer health disparities.
- For multidisciplinary teams, how collective expertise complements and contributes to project success.
Additional Review Criteria (not scored but considered for overall impact)
- Protections for Human Subjects: Evaluate justification for involvement, proposed protections against risks, potential benefits, importance of knowledge gained, and data/safety monitoring (if applicable).
- Vertebrate Animals: Evaluate proposed procedures, justification for use, interventions to minimize discomfort, and justification for euthanasia method (if applicable).
- Biohazards: Evaluate specific materials/procedures for hazards to personnel/environment and proposed protections.
- Resubmissions/Renewals/Revisions: Progress made, appropriateness of expansion, as applicable.
Additional Review Considerations (not scored but considered for overall impact)
- Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources: Plans for identifying and ensuring validity of resources.
- Budget and Period of Support: Justification and reasonableness of budget and requested project period in relation to the proposed research.
Selection Criteria
- Scientific and technical merit determined by peer review.
- Availability of funds.
- Relevance of the proposed project to program priorities (NCI's DCB, DCP, and CCHE interests).