Standard Horizon Europe evaluation criteria (Excellence, Impact, Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation) will be applied.
Excellence
- Comprehensive and interdisciplinary understanding of climate justice in EU and global mitigation/adaptation policies.
- Promotion of awareness, consistency, and co-production approaches in research.
- Consideration of socio-economic, territorial, and development disparities between and within countries/regions.
- Addressing multiple dimensions of justice and diverse spatial/temporal scales (e.g., intergenerational justice).
- Exploration of a broad range of social, political, economic, and cultural contexts and factors.
- Development of recommendations for designing, implementing, and evaluating just climate transitions, including specific indicators, standards, and criteria.
- Strengthening, diversification, and inclusivity of the evidence base underpinning IPCC assessments.
- Better incorporation of social science perspectives on justice and equity into policy narratives, scenarios, and models.
- Proposals should address aspects such as improving integrated assessment models for justice/equity, enhancing clarity/comparability of global mitigation scenarios, analyzing distributional aspects of climate policies, assessing trade-offs/co-benefits, investigating innovative climate policy instruments, and justice in sectoral transitions.
Impact
- Climate policies are made more inclusive and equitable, facilitating acceptance across diverse stakeholders.
- High ambition climate action is enabled, contributing to the European Green Deal's commitment to 'leave no one behind'.
- Improved consensus between the Global North and Global South within the UNFCCC process.
- Greater momentum is achieved in the implementation of the Paris Agreement.
- Societal relevance of climate action strategies is improved, ensuring reflection of diverse societal needs and values.
- Trust in results and outcomes is built, increasing their uptake potential.
Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation
- Quality of the proposed activities for each work package and the corresponding resources.
- Appropriateness and soundness of the lump sum budget estimation, including checking by experts with financial know-how.
- Effective contribution of SSH expertise and its meaningful support for Societal Readiness.
- Design of project objectives that integrate Societal Readiness related activities.
- Quality of collaboration between research teams from Europe and low/middle-income countries.
- Demonstrated involvement of key stakeholders, regional experts, and civil society.
- Clear plans for networking, intercomparison, and joint activities with other relevant projects (clustering activities).