The evaluation criteria, scoring, and thresholds for this grant are comprehensively detailed in section 9 of the full call document. The provided information only indicates where these criteria can be found, not the specifics.
Based on common EU grant practices and the grant's stated objective, successful proposals are typically evaluated on factors such as:
- Relevance: How well the proposal aligns with the grant's objective of supporting migrant women's integration and the broader AMIF program priorities.
- Quality of the Project: This includes clarity of objectives, appropriateness of methodology, feasibility, and efficiency of resource allocation.
- Impact: The expected social impact, potential for sustained benefits, and contribution to the integration of migrant women. This will likely include alignment with cross-cutting themes such as gender equality and social inclusion.
- Operational Capacity: The applicant's ability to implement the project, including the competence and experience of the project team.
- Value for Money: The cost-effectiveness of the proposed activities.
While not explicit scoring factors, the mention of 'AI' and 'Digital Agenda' as cross-cutting priorities in the metadata suggests that innovative approaches incorporating digital tools or artificial intelligence for integration measures might be viewed favorably or contribute to higher scoring.