Applications are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system, with an overall impact score.
Scored Review Criteria
These factors receive a separate criterion score and contribute to the overall impact score:
-
Factor 1. Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation):
- Significance: Potential to link mechanisms/risk factors to NPS across levels of analysis; clarify neurobiological/behavioral mechanisms of NPS in AD/ADRD.
- Innovation: Extent to which the proposed paradigm, model, or assay significantly advances scientific knowledge toward linking mechanisms/risk factors to NPS; integration of multiple levels of analysis regarding dynamic relationships between NPS symptoms and AD pathogenesis.
-
Factor 2. Rigor and Feasibility (Approach):
- Appropriate theoretical justification for the proposed approach.
- For imaging studies: Examination of neural circuits in NPS in AD/ADRD compared to other neuropsychiatric diseases.
- For animal studies: Well-validated models of circuitry involved in NPS and corresponding validated behavioral assays.
-
Factor 3. Expertise and Resources (Investigator(s) and Environment):
- Qualifications and experience of the research team.
- Adequacy of the scientific environment and resources to conduct the proposed research.
Additional Review Criteria (considered, but not scored)
- Protections for Human Subjects: Evaluation of plans for human subject research safety and ethics.
- Vertebrate Animals: Justification for animal use, minimization of discomfort, and euthanasia methods if applicable.
- Biohazards: Assessment of safety measures for hazardous materials/procedures.
- Resubmissions: Evaluation of the entire application as presented.
- Revisions: Appropriateness of proposed expansion of project scope.
Additional Review Considerations
- Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources: Plans for identifying and ensuring validity of resources.
- Budget and Period of Support: Justification and reasonableness of the requested budget and project duration in relation to proposed research.
- Scientific and Technical Merit: As determined by peer review.
- Availability of Funds: Contingent on NIH appropriations.
- Relevance to Program Priorities: Alignment with NIMH and NIA specific research interests.