EVALUATION CRITERIA
Proposals will be evaluated based on the standard criteria for Horizon Europe Innovation Actions. The 'Impact' criterion will be weighted 1.5 times higher than 'Excellence' and 'Quality and efficiency of the implementation'. The evaluation threshold is 3/5 for each criterion and 10/15 overall.
Scoring Factors
-
Excellence (Threshold: 3/5):
- Clarity and pertinence of the project’s objectives.
- Ambition of the proposed work and the extent to which it goes beyond the state-of-the-art.
- Soundness of the proposed methodology, including inter-disciplinary approaches, consideration of the gender dimension, and the quality of open science practices.
-
Impact (Threshold: 3/5, Weight: 1.5):
- Credibility of the pathways to achieve the expected outcomes and impacts specified in the work programme.
- The likely scale and significance of the project's contributions to making critical infrastructure more resilient.
- Suitability and quality of the measures to maximise impact, as detailed in the dissemination and exploitation plan.
-
Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation (Threshold: 3/5):
- Quality and effectiveness of the work plan, including the appropriateness of effort assigned to work packages and overall resources.
- Assessment of risks and proposed mitigation measures.
- Capacity of each participant and the extent to which the consortium as a whole brings together the necessary expertise.
Innovation & Impact
Projects are expected to develop innovative solutions that directly contribute to the following outcomes:
* Increased resilience of critical infrastructure to a wide range of threats.
* Improved mapping of interdependencies for better crisis management.
* Better monitoring, risk assessment, and security tools for operators and authorities.
* Enhanced post-incident investigation capabilities.
* Development of effective digital tools for stress testing and training curricula for practitioners.
Project Quality
- The methodology must be sound, and the work plan must be clear, effective, and well-resourced.
- Proposals must convincingly explain how they will carry out demonstrations, testing, or validation of the developed tools and solutions in an operational environment, involving the required practitioners.
- A mid-term deliverable is required, consisting of an assessment of the project's progress performed by the practitioners involved.
Strategic Fit
- Proposals should address new challenges not covered by the Horizon Europe 'Resilient Infrastructure' calls of 2023 and 2024.
- Projects must demonstrate how they build upon, and do not duplicate, outcomes from the 2021-2022 calls.
- The proposal should align with key EU policies, including the CER Directive, NIS2 Directive, Security Union Strategy, and EU Adaptation Strategy.
Cross-cutting Themes
- Gender Dimension: Integration of sex and gender analysis is required only if relevant to the project's objectives. Applicants must justify their approach. A Gender Equality Plan (GEP) is mandatory for certain types of organizations.
- Tie-breaker: For proposals with the same score, gender balance among leading researchers, followed by geographic diversity, can be used as prioritisation factors.