Reviewers will assess applications based on "Overall Impact" and scored criteria, with additional considerations.
Overall Impact
- Assesses the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved.
Scored Review Criteria (Given separate scores)
- Significance:
- Importance of the proposed clinical trial.
- Discussion of risks and benefits.
- How results (positive or negative) will advance product development.
- Why the proposed trial is necessary to inform subsequent efficacy trial design.
- Investigator(s):
- Experience of PD(s)/PI(s) and other Senior/Key Personnel in clinical trial conduct and disease area.
- Documented timely submission of primary publications from previous trials.
- Innovation:
- Encouragement of innovative and efficient study designs (e.g., adaptive dose-finding, futility designs, Bayesian designs for devices).
- Preference for utilizing digital/mobile/sensor technologies and web-based systems for data collection.
- Approach:
- Soundness of scientific rationale and preliminary data (including preclinical/clinical studies and rigor guidelines).
- Clear go/no-go criteria for later-stage exploratory studies.
- Evidence that relevant stakeholders have equipoise and view the study as important/acceptable.
- Discussion of potential biases/challenges and how addressed.
- Environment:
- Adequacy of resources (institutional support, equipment, facilities, personnel).
- Suitability of clinical sites and patient populations.
Additional Review Criteria (Considered but not separately scored)
- Study Timeline:
- Achievability of proposed milestones for each project stage (startup, enrollment, data collection, analyses, reporting, publication).
- Commercialization Plan:
- Value of the SBIR/STTR project, expected outcomes, and impact.
- Company profile.
- Market, customer, and competition analysis.
- Intellectual property (IP) protection strategy, including constraints and future filing plans.
- Detailed Finance Plan for securing independent third-party investor funds (type, source, amount, schedule).
- Clear Statement of Need for government funding to accelerate commercialization.
- SBIR/STTR Commercialization History.
- Protections for Human Subjects:
- Adequacy of plans for human subjects protection.
- Data and Safety Monitoring Plan (DSMP).
- Clinical Site Monitoring Plan.
- Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Individuals Across the Lifespan:
- Adequacy of plans for inclusion and recruitment (site selection, community engagement, language access).
- Other: Vertebrate Animals, Biohazards, Resubmissions, Phase IIB Competing Renewals, Revisions will also be reviewed as applicable.
Additional Review Considerations (Considered but not scored and do not influence overall impact)
- Applications with Foreign Components: Justification and necessity for work outside the US.
- Resource Sharing Plans: Reasonableness of plans or rationale for not sharing.
- Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources: Plans for identifying and ensuring validity.
- Budget and Period of Support: Justification and reasonableness relative to proposed research.