Applications are evaluated based on scientific and technical merit using the following scored review criteria:
- Factor 1: Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation): Reviewers will assess how well the proposed project will advance understanding of the relationship between social media and adolescent mental illness, psychiatric symptoms, and/or risk or resilience for psychopathology.
- Factor 2: Rigor and Feasibility (Approach): This involves evaluating the rigor and reproducibility of social media measures, the rationale for how social media behaviors will be measured across time/platforms, and evidence that proposed approaches are feasible and go beyond simple assessments of time spent. For intervention studies, explicit plans for evaluating the mechanism of action are crucial, including a conceptual framework, assessment plans, and analytical plans.
- Factor 3: Expertise and Resources (Investigator(s) and Environment): This criterion considers the qualifications of the Program Director(s)/Principal Investigator(s) and the adequacy of the research environment to successfully conduct the proposed work.
Additional Review Considerations (not scored individually but contribute to the overall impact score):
- Protections for Human Subjects: Adequacy of protections against risks, potential benefits, and the importance of knowledge to be gained.
- Vertebrate Animals: Justification for animal use, appropriateness of species, and methods to minimize discomfort.
- Biohazards: Assessment of hazards to personnel/environment and proposed protections.
- Resubmissions/Renewals/Revisions: Evaluation of previous progress and appropriateness of proposed changes.
- Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources.
- Budget and Period of Support: Justification and reasonableness of the requested budget and project period.
Reviewers are encouraged to consider applications that include a
youth advisory board to provide input on research design and dissemination. Projects that include an
ethical research component or collaborations with
ethics consultants are also encouraged. The NIMH particularly encourages research that aims to
reduce disparities and advance
equity in youth mental health interventions, services, and outcomes.