The evaluation process for this grant is rigorous and conducted in
two stages:
Stage I (Pass/Fail Criteria)
Projects are first assessed against mandatory 'TAK/NIE' (YES/NO) criteria. A project must receive a 'TAK' for every criterion to proceed to Stage II. Critical criteria assessed at this stage include:
- Applicant Eligibility: Verification that the applicant(s) meet the specified legal, operational, and historical requirements (e.g., presence in Poland, operational history for enterprises).
- Thematic Compliance: Ensuring the project aligns with the grant's thematic scope, specifically digital technologies, deep-tech, critical technologies, and strengthening critical technology value chains, as defined in the call documents.
- R&D Character: Confirmation that the project solely involves industrial research and/or experimental development, excluding basic research or routine activities.
- Exclusion Check: Verification that the project does not fall into any of the excluded categories (e.g., fossil fuels, military use, certain business process innovations).
Stage II (Scored and Pass/Fail Criteria)
Projects that pass Stage I undergo a more detailed evaluation, including a panel meeting with the applicant. This stage comprises both scored criteria and additional pass/fail criteria.
Scored Criteria (0 or 3-5 points each; minimum of 3 points required to pass each):
-
Impact on Reducing EU Strategic Dependence: This is a crucial criterion. Evaluators will assess how the project's R&D results contribute to:
- EU leadership in industry and technology.
- Contribution to critical European infrastructure.
- Increased production capacity.
- Enhanced supply security.
- Promotion of positive cross-border effects within the internal market.
-
Additional Points (up to 2 points): Awarded if the project's results bring significant economic potential to the EU market (meaning beyond the applicant's local market, impacting various EU markets and potentially generating external effects in other member states like economic growth, employment, R&D investment) and if they yield broad positive social, environmental, or climate impacts at least at the EU level.
-
R&D Work Plan: Assessment of the clarity, necessity, and logical coherence of the R&D tasks. This includes the adequacy of the proposed research methodology, correct categorization of R&D work, the measurability and verifiability of milestones for each task, and the sufficiency of the risk analysis and proposed mitigation actions.
-
Project Implementation Potential: Evaluation of the applicant's readiness to execute the project, focusing on:
-
Project Team: Availability and adequacy of the key project team (R&D manager, management), their experience, roles, and commitment. At least one key team member must have experience in implementing R&D results in business.
-
Resources: Sufficiency of technical resources, including scientific and research infrastructure and intellectual property rights required for the R&D.
-
Subcontractors: Justification for their involvement, their technical capacity, and verification of no conflict of interest.
-
Potential for Implementation of Project Results: Evaluation of the feasibility and profitability of deploying the R&D outcomes. This includes:
- A rational and justified plan for implementation (must occur within
5 years of project completion).
- The form of implementation (self-implementation within the EU or licensing to another EU-based enterprise for deployment).
- Market analysis and financial forecasts demonstrating the profitability of the new product/service or process.
- The applicant's resources (personnel, technical, certifications) for implementation.
- A clear strategy for intellectual property protection (e.g., patenting), ensuring it prevents unauthorized use.
-
Implementation of R&D Results in Poland (0 or 5 points, optional): This criterion offers additional points for projects that plan to deploy their R&D results in Poland, contributing positively to the Polish economy (e.g., creating jobs, increasing exports, attracting investments). This applies to self-implementation or through a licensee in Poland. This criterion is
not obligatory to pass the grant.
Pass/Fail Criteria (evaluated as 'TAK/NIE' in Stage II):
-
Project Budget: Examination of the budget's rationality, justification, and adherence to public aid limits, minimum qualified cost thresholds, and subcontracting limits. For consortia, the 50% enterprise cost share rule is checked.
-
Incentive Effect: Confirmation that project activities did not begin before the application submission date.
-
Financial Capability: Assessment of the applicant's (and consortium members') ability to finance the project, including their own contribution, based on financial models and available records.
-
Horizontal Principles: Compliance with EU principles of equal opportunities and non-discrimination (including accessibility for persons with disabilities) and gender equality.
-
Fundamental Rights: Adherence to the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.
-
UNCRPD Compliance: Adherence to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
-
Sustainable Development: Compliance with the principle of sustainable development, including the 'do no significant harm' rule, application of 6R principles (Refuse, Reduce, Reuse, Recover, Recycle, Rethink), and positive environmental impact supported by measurable indicators (at least two, one showing at least 10% improvement).
-
Project Indicators: Ensuring consistency, measurability, verifiability, and realism of all project output and outcome indicators (excluding specific environmental and financial indicators assessed elsewhere).
Tie-Breaking Criteria:
In cases where multiple projects achieve the same total score and cannot all be funded, the following criteria are applied in order:
1. Projects with a higher score in the criterion: 'Impact on reducing EU strategic dependence.'
2. Projects where the applicant (or at least one consortium member) has been a member of a
National Key Cluster for at least 6 months.
3. Projects with a higher percentage of
women in the key project team.