Two-Stage Evaluation Process
This grant uses a two-stage submission and evaluation procedure.
First Stage Evaluation
- Only the 'Excellence' and 'Impact' criteria are evaluated at this stage.
- The threshold for each individual criterion is 4 out of 5.
- The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the two individual scores, will be set to ensure that the total requested budget of proposals admitted to Stage 2 is approximately three times (and not less than two and a half times) the available budget. This threshold is normally expected to be 8 or 8.5.
Excellence (First Stage)
- Clarity and pertinence of the project's objectives.
- Ambition of the proposed work and its extent beyond the current state-of-the-art.
- Soundness of the overall methodology.
- Appropriate consideration of the gender dimension within research and innovation content.
- Quality of open science practices, including the sharing and management of research outputs, and engagement with citizens/civil society.
Impact (First Stage)
- Credibility of the pathways designed to achieve the expected outcomes and impacts specified in the work programme.
- The likely scale and significance of the contributions expected from the project.
Second Stage Evaluation (Full Application)
- All three criteria: 'Excellence', 'Impact', and 'Quality and efficiency of the implementation' are evaluated.
- The threshold for each individual criterion is 3 out of 5.
- The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the three individual scores, is 10.
- For Innovation Actions, the score for 'Impact' will be given a weight of 1.5.
Excellence (Second Stage)
- Clarity and pertinence of the project's objectives, and the extent to which the proposed work is ambitious and goes beyond the state-of-the-art.
- Soundness of the proposed methodology, including underlying concepts, models, assumptions, inter-disciplinary approaches, appropriate consideration of gender dimension in research and innovation content, and quality of open science practices (sharing/management of research outputs, engagement of citizens/civil society).
Impact (Second Stage)
- Credibility of the pathways to achieve the expected outcomes and impacts specified in the work programme.
- Suitability and quality of measures to maximize expected outcomes and impacts, as outlined in the dissemination and exploitation plan (including communication activities).
- Likely scale and significance of the contributions from the project.
Quality and efficiency of the implementation (Second Stage)
- Quality and effectiveness of the work plan and assessment of risks.
- Appropriateness of the effort assigned to work packages and overall resources.
- Capacity and role of each participant, and the extent to which the consortium collectively possesses the necessary expertise.
Tie-Breaking Procedure (for equally scored proposals)
- Proposals addressing aspects of the call not covered by higher-ranked proposals receive highest priority.
- Prioritization is then based on the 'Excellence' score, followed by 'Impact' (for Innovation Actions, 'Impact' score first, then 'Excellence').
- If still tied, gender balance among researchers named in the proposal is considered.
- Further prioritization may consider geographical diversity (number of Member States/Associated Countries represented).
- Finally, other factors related to call objectives (e.g., synergy, SME involvement) may be used.