Scored Review Criteria (Factors determining scientific merit and overall impact score)
- Factor 1: Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation)
- Factor 2: Rigor and Feasibility (Approach)
- Factor 3: Expertise and Resources (Investigator(s) and Environment)
- Investigator(s): Evaluate background, training, and expertise appropriate for their career stage. For Multiple PI applications, assess the quality of the leadership plan.
- Environment: Evaluate if institutional resources are appropriate to ensure successful execution of the proposed work.
- Specific to this NOFO: Evaluate the potential of the PD/PI to become an independent researcher if the proposed project is successful.
Additional Review Criteria (Considered for overall impact score, but not separately scored)
- Protections for Human Subjects: If applicable, evaluate justification for involvement, proposed protections, potential benefits, importance of knowledge, and data/safety monitoring for clinical trials. For exempt research, evaluate justification for exemption, human subjects involvement/characteristics, and sources of materials.
- Vertebrate Animals: If applicable, evaluate description of procedures, justifications for use/species, interventions to minimize discomfort, and justification for euthanasia.
- Biohazards: If applicable, evaluate whether materials/procedures are significantly hazardous and if adequate protection is proposed.
- Resubmissions: Evaluate the full application as presented.
- Renewals: Evaluate progress made in the last funding period.
- Revisions: Evaluate the appropriateness of the proposed expansion of the project scope.
Additional Review Considerations (Not scored, not for overall impact score, but considered)
- Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources: For projects involving these resources, evaluate brief plans for identifying and ensuring their validity.
- Budget and Period of Support: Evaluate whether the budget and requested period are fully justified and reasonable in relation to the proposed research.