Overall Impact
- Reviewers will assess the likelihood of the project to have a sustained and powerful influence on the relevant research field(s).
Factor 1: Importance of the Research
- Significance: How important is the proposed research in addressing current scientific challenges? Does it fill a knowledge gap, solve a critical problem, or create a valuable advance? Is the scientific background and rationale rigorous and justified?
- Innovation: Does the project apply novel concepts, methods, or technologies, or use existing ones in new ways, to enhance its impact? Note: A project doesn't need to be novel to be important.
Factor 2: Rigor and Feasibility
- Rigor: Will the project produce unbiased, reproducible, and robust data? Is the experimental design rigorous with appropriate controls and justified sample sizes? Are plans for analysis, interpretation, and reporting robust? Are relevant biological variables (e.g., sex, age) adequately addressed? For human/vertebrate subjects, are interventions rigorous, outcomes justified, and results generalizable/relevant?
- Feasibility: Is the proposed approach sound and achievable? Are there plans to address potential problems? For less certain projects, is the uncertainty balanced by potential major advances? For human subjects, is the plan to recruit and retain a diverse population adequate and feasible?
Factor 3: Expertise and Resources
- Investigator(s): Does the doctoral candidate (and advisor/team) demonstrate appropriate background, training, and expertise for their career stage to conduct the work? For multi-PI applications (though not allowed for this grant type), the quality of the leadership plan is considered.
- Environment: Are the institutional resources appropriate and sufficient to ensure the successful completion of the proposed dissertation research?
Additional Review Criteria (Considered but not scored)
- Protections for Human Subjects: Justification for involvement, adequacy of protection against risks, potential benefits, importance of knowledge, and data/safety monitoring (if applicable).
- Vertebrate Animals: Description of procedures, justification for use and species, interventions to minimize discomfort, and justification for euthanasia method (if applicable).
- Biohazards: Assessment of specific hazardous materials/procedures and proposed protections.
- Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources: Brief plans for identifying and ensuring the validity of these resources.
- Budget and Period of Support: Evaluation of whether the requested budget and duration are justified and reasonable for the proposed research.