The evaluation criteria are primarily based on Annex D of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes. While specific scoring thresholds are not provided in this document, proposals will typically be assessed on:
Excellence
- Clarity and pertinence of the project's objectives, specifically how they align with the EU-AU Partnership on Climate Change and Sustainable Energy.
- Soundness of the proposed methodology, including approaches for developing joint roadmaps, mobilizing commitments, and integrating diverse knowledge sources.
- Quality and innovativeness of the proposed research and coordination activities, particularly in addressing climate data gaps and enhancing climate services.
Impact
- Credibility of the pathways to achieve the expected outcomes, such as reinforcing R&I coordination, enhancing funding impact, and strengthening the AU climate research community.
- Measures taken to maximize impact through effective dissemination, valorisation, and uptake of project outputs among African and European stakeholders.
- Contribution to climate and disaster resilience in AU member states, informed decision-making, and science-based implementation of the Paris Agreement and Agenda 2030.
Quality and Efficiency of the Implementation
- Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including the timeline for key deliverables like the joint roadmap within the first year.
- Competence, complementarity, and commitment of the consortium members, emphasizing strong African representation.
- Appropriateness of the resources allocated to the project activities.
- Quality of the risk management strategy and measures to mitigate potential challenges.
Cross-Cutting Themes (Implicit)
- Integration of inclusivity and diversity, specifically in capacity building efforts (e.g., greater participation of women, youth, indigenous, and marginalised communities).
- Adherence to FAIR principles for data management and promotion of indigenous knowledge and Citizen Science.