Overall Impact
Reviewers will assess the likelihood of the proposed project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s).
Scored Review Criteria
These factors contribute to the scientific merit and overall impact score:
-
Factor 1: Importance of the Research (Significance and Innovation)
- Assesses the project's potential to advance scientific knowledge and/or improve health, and the innovativeness of the concepts, approaches, or methods proposed.
-
Factor 2: Rigor and Feasibility (Approach)
- Evaluates the design, methods, and analyses for their scientific rigor, and the feasibility of the proposed work.
-
Factor 3: Expertise and Resources (Investigator(s) and Environment)
- Considers the qualifications and experience of the PD/PI and research team, and the adequacy of the institutional environment and resources.
Additional Review Criteria (Considered, but not scored individually)
- Protections for Human Subjects: Adequacy of protections for research participants.
- Vertebrate Animals: Justification for use, appropriateness of species, interventions to minimize discomfort, and justification for euthanasia methods (if applicable).
- Biohazards: Assessment of specific hazardous materials or procedures and proposed protections.
- Resubmissions: Evaluation of the revised application based on previous reviews.
Additional Review Considerations (Considered, but not scored individually)
- Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources: Plans for identifying and ensuring validity of resources.
- Budget and Period of Support: Justification and reasonableness of the budget and requested project period in relation to the proposed research.
- Institutional Commitment: The strength of the institution's commitment to supporting the PD/PI's research (e.g., startup packages, salary, protected time, space, equipment, core facilities, specialized training) will be a factor in the review.